Taper to Carry
Last week we introduced the theoretical ‘taper to carry’ scenario whereby the Federal Reserve would indeed ‘have the balls’ to begin the end of traditional QE and transition the inflation via a new set of mechanics. Mind you, we still get inflation under this scenario, but it would be less stealth and more honest and obvious to the public. Here are the theoretical components of the play…
- Simultaneous ZIRP & QE have served to liquefy banks and maintain tepid economic growth while capping inflationary pressure, as banks hold significant reserves ‘in house’ until conditions are ‘right’ (read: profitable).
- There would be much public hand wringing about rising interest rates, which could undo the debt-leveraged economy. There would be a lot of noise in the perma-bear and gold bug camps that the Fed would not dare to taper QE.
- Yet taper they do, with the knowledge that the next ‘fix’ is already in. The rising long-term interest rates that would result from such action (tapering of bond purchase program, AKA QE) would immediately benefit the banks as they ‘carry’ the free money received from the Fed on the short end and roll it into profits by lending at higher interest rates on the long end.
- This process can be regulated as policy makers see fit. It is a “taper” after all!
All of the above imagines what could be an actual plan being promoted behind the scenes by entities far removed from this simple newsletter writer and his thoughts about what they will or maybe even should do. But I have yet to come up with (or be advised about) reasons why this scenario should be disqualified as a valid and rational ‘next step’ in the ongoing and systematic inflation attempt currently in progress.
I think that the last bullet point above is very important. Think about it; the smart man running the Federal Reserve has even introduced a word (taper) [edit: whether Ben Bernanke has actually used this word is irrelevant; its implication is front and center] that implies the process of transitioning the inflation from one form to another would be regulated as needed. He may be attempting control the pace of transition so things do not get too hot or too cold at any given time. Genius! If it works.
I think there may be recognition on the part of officials that the game of printing money out of old, bloated and un-payable debt while hammering gold (the early warning inflation barometer) is getting long in the tooth. Of course, this is not out of any sympathy for the gold bugs but rather a realization that a ‘lukewarm and rudderless’ economy against a systematic backdrop of debt monetization and money creation is not going remain politically expedient.
Enter our friends the Pigs (AKA the main players in the last doomed inflation and subsequent liquidation, the banks). This is simply the Greenspan playbook warmed over. Greenspan used different mechanics to create his credit bubble but the play was to get the banks to profitably ‘carry’ the spread and lend out into the economy. There is nothing new under the sun today if our ‘taper and carry’ thesis is viable and likely.
BKX-SPX Ratio (candlesticks) w/ TNX (blue line)
Last week the BKX ratio to the S&P 500 (candlesticks) took a hit but remained above the breakout line and this should remain a barometer to a confirmation of our would-be ‘carry’ play or a negation of it. So far so good. Long-term interest rates (blue line) also got through another week in breakout territory.
Against this backdrop let’s remember that the Fed is only jawboning a QE taper, not an end to inflationary ZIRP. This looks like a well-scripted plan by intellectual inflators that are much more sophisticated than the great Maestro of the previous inflationary era. But then they have to be sophisticated because things are so much more leveraged in rising debt with the cost of failure a likely unwinding of the current system.
‘All or nothing’ is the play and these players are winning (duh). Gold bugs and their quaint notions of honest money are losing (for now). Stock market bears – outside of an expected summer correction (which could play well into the script outlined above as inflation is best promoted against a worried public) may lose as well, at least for however long a new inflation cycle lasts.
If and when the banks become incentivized to get the inflated funds ‘out there’, asset prices are going to go up. This is what being bullish means in the current era, basically taking advantage policy designed to prop asset prices; i.e. inflationary policy.
Bear in mind that all the above is where a letter writer’s logical thought process has taken him. But here is the thing, I sit down each weekend to write a letter, not make policy. I observe financial markets with an attitude of trying to find the honest answers as to what is going on in a very complex macro financial world. But I do not have the answers. I only have my own logic, which could prove to be wrong.
But for another week at least, the theory lives on. What would be even better for the theory is if in the days or weeks ahead the Fed jawbones continue to promote a ‘taper’ to QE, T bonds continue to drop (rates up) financial markets correct on this noise and the banks out perform the S&P 500, indicating the next inflationary solution. It’s a tall order, but I’d rather have a game plan that can be revised or discredited than to be flying blind.